- Joined
- Sep 24, 2011
- Messages
- 45,400
- Reaction score
- 60,086
- Location
- Atlanta
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
No thank you.While we all watch Carter's state funeral, the House is busy trying to pass an interesting piece of legislation.
The "Illegitimate Court Counteraction Act" that basically sanctions the International Criminal Court.
Kind of on the fence on the effect of this effort. We already as a nation do not recognize the ICC as any sort of authority on criminal matters, but this one largely seems to be about a response to Israel and Netanyahu. The legislation expands Presidential power to deal with ICC holdings in the US, or members of and their holdings in the US.
Thoughts?
Text of Bill:
I’m mildly uncomfortable with this bill but it’s not a strong feeling. We are not a signatory to the Rome accord so we have no obligation to the ICC. This bill goes further and attempts to undermine the ICC altogether. I’d prefer we didn’t do that, but also recognize that most nations will protect their people and not voluntarily submit to an international court anyway.While we all watch Carter's state funeral, the House is busy trying to pass an interesting piece of legislation.
The "Illegitimate Court Counteraction Act" that basically sanctions the International Criminal Court.
Kind of on the fence on the effect of this effort. We already as a nation do not recognize the ICC as any sort of authority on criminal matters, but this one largely seems to be about a response to Israel and Netanyahu. The legislation expands Presidential power to deal with ICC holdings in the US, or members of and their holdings in the US. Meaning, business interests and real estate here owned by someone somehow related to the ICC.
Thoughts?
Text of Bill:
I’m mildly uncomfortable with this bill but it’s not a strong feeling. We are not a signatory to the Rome accord so we have no obligation to the ICC. This bill goes further and attempts to undermine the ICC altogether. I’d prefer we didn’t do that, but also recognize that most nations will protect their people and not voluntarily submit to an international court anyway.
What got my attention was the retaliatory nature of the wording in the bill, specifically calling out protection of US interests and specifically calling out actions against Israel means the US can target the ICC here.
Setting the stage for an eventual showdown over something.
ICC as well as the UN, is full of anti american, anti democracy idiots. The U.S. has to stay involved to protect our and other democratic nations interest.While we all watch Carter's state funeral, the House is busy trying to pass an interesting piece of legislation.
The "Illegitimate Court Counteraction Act" that basically sanctions the International Criminal Court.
Kind of on the fence on the effect of this effort. We already as a nation do not recognize the ICC as any sort of authority on criminal matters, but this one largely seems to be about a response to Israel and Netanyahu. The legislation expands Presidential power to deal with ICC holdings in the US, or members of and their holdings in the US. Meaning, business interests and real estate here owned by someone somehow related to the ICC.
Thoughts?
Text of Bill:
Agreed. US policy to date has been to ignore the ICC. This bill moves us to a situation of active hostility toward the ICC. In isolation, I probably would not have a strong allergic reaction to it. However it’s coming at a time when we are becoming actively hostile to everybody including our allies. In that context, all this will accomplish is accelerate the timetable upon which the US dollar is no longer the reserve currency of choice, and our banks no longer are able to act as an instrument for global sanctions.What got my attention was the retaliatory nature of the wording in the bill, specifically calling out protection of US interests and specifically calling out actions against Israel means the US can target the ICC here.
Setting the stage for an eventual showdown over something.
ICC as well as the UN, is full of anti american, anti democracy idiots. The U.S. has to stay involved to protect our and other democratic nations interest.
The United States should, in no way, recognize the corrupt ICC. And if they attempt to do something to a valuable partner like Israel, we should target them.What got my attention was the retaliatory nature of the wording in the bill, specifically calling out protection of US interests and specifically calling out actions against Israel means the US can target the ICC here.
Setting the stage for an eventual showdown over something.
Agreed. US policy to date has been to ignore the ICC. This bill moves us to a situation of active hostility toward the ICC. In isolation, I probably would not have a strong allergic reaction to it. However it’s coming at a time when we are becoming actively hostile to everybody including our allies. In that context, all this will accomplish is accelerate the timetable upon which the US dollar is no longer the reserve currency of choice, and our banks no longer are able to act as an instrument for global sanctions.
I do not doubt that the ICC will respond, even if in statement about their intentions to deal with Netanyahu if some ICC friendly nation has the grapes to detain him. I am reading that Poland has already agreed to not detain Netanyahu on his Auschwitz memorial visit later this month.
Something else on my mind, that is already starting to happen, is nations lining up as agreeing or not with ICC (recognizing member or not.) On the international stage, and to your point, hostility is bound to do nothing but go up as other nations align more to ignoring ICC wants.
The US Dollar as reserve currency status for other nations is an interesting side bar to this conversation, let me ponder on that a bit but I can see the ICC all of a sudden looking to their nations and suggesting distancing policy from the US. More to follow on that point, but a sort of economic warfare may be emerging.
While we all watch Carter's state funeral, the House is busy trying to pass an interesting piece of legislation.
The "Illegitimate Court Counteraction Act" that basically sanctions the International Criminal Court.
Kind of on the fence on the effect of this effort. We already as a nation do not recognize the ICC as any sort of authority on criminal matters, but this one largely seems to be about a response to Israel and Netanyahu. The legislation expands Presidential power to deal with ICC holdings in the US, or members of and their holdings in the US. Meaning, business interests and real estate here owned by someone somehow related to the ICC.
Thoughts?
Text of Bill:
I do not doubt that the ICC will respond, even if in statement about their intentions to deal with Netanyahu if some ICC friendly nation has the grapes to detain him. I am reading that Poland has already agreed to not detain Netanyahu on his Auschwitz memorial visit later this month.
Something else on my mind, that is already starting to happen, is nations lining up as agreeing or not with ICC (recognizing member or not.) On the international stage, and to your point, hostility is bound to do nothing but go up as other nations align more to ignoring ICC wants.
The US Dollar as reserve currency status for other nations is an interesting side bar to this conversation, let me ponder on that a bit but I can see the ICC all of a sudden looking to their nations and suggesting distancing policy from the US. More to follow on that point, but a sort of economic warfare may be emerging.
Israel and certain segments of the United States political apparatus wish to take advantage of the weakening of the international rules-based order which we worked so hard to build as a nation.
The ICC is a fraudulent organization that serves only Russia and Iran. This is why we are not part of it.''The postwar global order is not just obsolete; it is now a weapon being used against us.''
There it is. Fait accompli. From Rubio of all people.
The ICC is a fraudulent organization that serves only Russia and Iran. This is why we are not part of it.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?