Born Free
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Sep 21, 2011
- Messages
- 9,161
- Reaction score
- 2,142
- Location
- Sonny and Nice
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
You support fraud, we get it. At least with DOD, our soldiers have the best equipment, employment stays healthy building the materials needed but with fraudulent disability we get nothing except the unwanted fart in the elevator from some fat ass milking the system.
so as the country continually increases debt and more and more people are sitting at home collecting the free check, pat yourself on the back if you voted for Obama and his ilk when the country fails completely
All liberals support fraud, it's mostly liberals that commit the fraud. They are the entitled one. And they are the ones that do not want to reform any social program to eliminate fraud. They say "SO WHAT" or "WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES IT MAKE"
I agree with you about the fraud, in all programs, but to mitigate that fraud we would need more government spending to catch the fraud. I don't see either side really pushing for that solution.
All liberals support fraud, it's mostly liberals that commit the fraud. They are the entitled one. And they are the ones that do not want to reform any social program to eliminate fraud. They say "SO WHAT" or "WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES IT MAKE"
Ah yes, more generic bull****. Please show us how most of the fraud is by liberals. This should be entertaining BS. Remember, to fix this problem we would need more government spending WHICH CONS LIKE YOU are against. So by your logic, Cons support fraud. I don't personally believe that, but it is using YOUR logic.
I see the Pubs wanting to reform entitlement programs and the Dems are against it and that reform would include fraud.
Comments like this are why you're impossible to take seriously.
Now tell me who is pushing for entitlement reforms.
Really? where? I don't see PUBES doing anything about reform, just talk.
Comments like this are why you're impossible to take seriously.
You are right about one thing, it is the Pubs that are the only ones talking about entitlement reforms, but for now we have a no nothing president and senate leader that is his partner.
Not the PUBES you support that's for sure, where are the plans to spend more government money on oversight then?
Comments like this are why you're impossible to take seriously.
You are right about one thing, it is the Pubs that are the only ones talking about entitlement reforms, but for now we have a no nothing president and senate leader that is his partner.
Speaking like a true liberal. I do like how you admit are against stopping fraud in entitlement programs. And that is exactly what I said about liberals supporting fraud. You are against entitlement reforms. Period. Yet the Pubs want entitlement reform and in doing so would put in place measure to help prevent fraud. And any prevention would be a net gain. But I see you are against that.
Speaking like a true liberal. I do like how you admit are against stopping fraud in entitlement programs. And that is exactly what I said about liberals supporting fraud. You are against entitlement reforms. Period. Yet the Pubs want entitlement reform and in doing so would put in place measure to help prevent fraud. And any prevention would be a net gain. But I see you are against that.
Right you're claiming the majority of fraud is from liberals (with non proof), but I'm the one not being serious. :roll: Sorry, when you make asinine comments, you get the same comments back.
And yes, the PUBES are talking, but that is all they do...talk. No action when it comes down to them in charge.
You didn't want to have a serious conversation from the start. But then most PUBE supporters aren't to be taken serious anyway.
And the liberals are also talking to not do any entitlement reforms. And with do nothing Obama and Reid as his dummy the Pubs are out of control.
Please show me where I am against stopping fraud in programs? You've already lost when you resort to lies like you have. Show me the proof where I am against reforms liar.
Just because the PUBES you support are all talk and NO action doesn't mean I am against reform.
I see no proof you are for reforms. Now is your chance to prove me wrong. Please do.
If I do a search and pull up all my comments on reform, will you leave the board never to return?
You like me that much. That's surprising
But I still don't see any proof. Like I said now's your chance. I even said "please".
While I don't agree with the ACA, I also don't agree with our old system working. Reforms are definitely needed which is something the GOP was not willing to even think about until ACA was passed.
Welfare needs reform, but it needs smart reform.
That's why I am for reform, limits, etc. It won't reward them, but help them.
Here you go:
Since you obviously won't agree to my bet, I'm not going to go back and show all, but here are some of my comments regarding reform:
http://www.debatepolitics.com/obama...r-premiums-nearly-20-lower-than-expected.html
http://www.debatepolitics.com/break...t-minimum-wage-increase-5.html#post1062535405
http://www.debatepolitics.com/polls/169423-should-daycare-subsidized-41.html#post1062180044
There are three selections there that prove your lies. Now are you going to man-up and apologize or run away like a coward from your lies?
I like that, I did not lie, I may have misspoke, you know like Obama.
But hey you and I are on the same page. I want reforms, Welfare was reformed and it proved to be a success.
Speaking like a true liberal. I do like how you admit are against stopping fraud in entitlement programs. And that is exactly what I said about liberals supporting fraud. You are against entitlement reforms. Period. Yet the Pubs want entitlement reform and in doing so would put in place measure to help prevent fraud. And any prevention would be a net gain. But I see you are against that.
No you flat out lied, you said (notice the bold):
I see you cannot even man-up and admit you lied even when it is PROVEN you did. Pathetic.
That was not a lie that was an assumption. I admit I made a bad assumption. If that is not good enough for you. So be it. Speaking of Pathetic.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?