- Joined
- Jun 16, 2019
- Messages
- 39,588
- Reaction score
- 38,119
- Location
- Tucson
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Other
Yeah, watching him screech about this is hilarious.I know that he's a felon who's been convicted of actual campaign finance laws.
Yeah, watching him screech about this is hilarious.I know that he's a felon who's been convicted of actual campaign finance laws.
I'm sorry you chose treason.Imagine those Jan. 6 "insurrectionists" rotting in jail and they were right.
Then it would have been presented to a judge instead of made into silly movie.What if it is 100% fact?
I might be wrong but it doesn't appear that it went to candidates,Then it would have been presented to a judge instead of made into silly movie.
It sounds like something from Rick and Morty.That sounds like a lot of mules.
He was stupid. Not very serious either. Far less money involved than what the law was looking to stop.
Like I said. That was stupid.The law was intended to prevent any straw donations - not just big ones.
And straw donations are actually a pretty big deal, in campaign finance law. It carries significantly harsher punishment than most other campaign finance crimes.
Saw it last night. Makes a rather compelling case for ballot trafficking.BTW have you seen it? I haven't yet what do think? So far peoples' minds blown...
Then it would have been presented to a judge instead of made into silly movie.
Saw it last night. Makes a rather compelling case for ballot trafficking.
Not "glitches", mostly mail-in votes being counted, which are much more Democratic, all as expected, including the Republican lies about it.They have been uncharacteristically silent during the pre-release. Sure explains a lot of middle of the night jumps in Biden's totals on Nov. 4. "Glitches," YeaRight.com
No, they were suckers. The guy who most belongs in jail isn't there. Yet.Imagine those Jan. 6 "insurrectionists" rotting in jail and they were right.
Zuck, the guy who allowed Russian trolls to interfere with the election? That guy?I can't wait for the left to explode when they see this film.
What was the cost in dollars and time?Saw it last night. Makes a rather compelling case for ballot trafficking.
$20 and maybe an hour and a half. I didn't pay that much attention to time.What was the cost in dollars and time?
I can't wait for the left to explode when they see this film.
Everyone have pom-poms?$20 and maybe an hour and a half. I didn't pay that much attention to time.
Oh! and $5.50 for a large popcorn.
Packed house, by the way.
For Ballot trafficking or against Ballot trafficking?Saw it last night. Makes a rather compelling case for ballot trafficking.
You've radicalized your speech, your title should read "heavily democratic".- Non-profit get out the vote funding is not illegal, as long as it is not biased to any party or candidate
- Ready? $33 million of Zuckerberg's $250M to CTCL went to just 3% of the US population, tightly concentrated in 4 swing states, in areas where Hillary won by an average of 80%. That is 13% of grants to 3% of the population
- Per-voter dollars in these areas was as much as $30 - $53 per voter. All other jurisdictions were a few bucks per voter.
Bottom line, Zuckerbucks broke the law.
-snip-
As I posted, you likely are acutely radicalized.Imagine those Jan. 6 "insurrectionists" rotting in jail and they were right.
I can't wait for the left to explode when they see this film.