- Joined
- Jan 28, 2006
- Messages
- 51,123
- Reaction score
- 15,259
- Location
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
HA! And Obama kept Git'mo open! Gotta love it....your Messiah takes office and fails to deliver :lamoI don't know. Maybe warrantless wiretapping, siezure of assets without due process, indefinite detention without a trial, even killing people who are suspected of certain crimes.
Oh wait. You said next. All that has already happened.
The definition of Anarchist is:Uh, the definition of an anarchist is someone who already committed a crime or is planning on one.
As a general statement, I'm going to give the government a pass to harass and abuse the occupy X folks as much as they want. OcupyX'ers are retards. Even if the police had abused them, I'm going to actively condone it.
Having said that, there was a riot, and the cops had a warrant. Don't like it? Don't be part of the occupy crowd.
I wonder how many leftist Occupiers are re-thinking their position on gun-control-er, I mean, yes, the government is justified is using all means necessary to put down Occupiers, yes, oppressive government FTW.You give the government a pass to harass and abuse your own countrymen? Really? Would you want someone standing by, watching, and giving the 'OK' to beat your head in?
I wonder how many leftist Occupiers are re-thinking their position on gun-control...
Yup, totally justified imo. There was a riot, there was reasonable suspicion, there was a warrant. I hope the cops kicked some ass. Good for them.Is that a yes or a no?
Yup, totally justified imo. There was a riot, there was reasonable suspicion, there was a warrant. I hope the cops kicked some ass. Good for them.
Well we can't have the police or anyone in uniform or 'connected' take action. However, I would give money to an underground or shadow 'organisation' who, say, deployed a metric ****-ton of OC gas on any given occupy crowd.You said the Occupy X folks. Do you mean all of them, a select few, what do you mean? Even the ones not being violent, which is the majority of them?
The definition of Anarchist is:
" a person who rebels against any authority, established order, or ruling power"
It says nothing about violence.
You give the government a pass to harass and abuse your own countrymen? Really? Would you want someone standing by, watching, and giving the 'OK' to beat your head in?
Actually, I'm pretty sure that the difference is that one of them has actually committed a crime, whereas the other only spouts bullsh*t from his facial orifice. It's kindof a big difference, actually.
Having a different political belief than you is not "traitorous".Anarchists are criminals and traitors; not traitors to any particular state but to the very concept of a state. And now for our next lesson, what do we do with traitors?
Yea and that is called totalitarian.Once upon a time, when America wasn't brainwashed by subhuman globalist scum, anyone who identified as an anarchist was prohibited from immigrating into the US.
Whoopi. Someone committed a crime, the cops investigated, then presented enough probable cause for a judge to issue a warrant and then the police executed a warrant. Whats the problem? It happened to a bunch of whaco nut jobs you liked instead of against those you didn't?
You want to use rhetoric like "Red Scare" to bring up memories of the House Commitee for Un-American Activities. Hardly, if the law wanted to find Un-American activities and "Reds", it would be raiding the White House and all offices associated with the Democrats political party, not some apartment complex in Seattle.
Uhh what crime did they commit?
And uhhh what did they find via the warrant?
The best way to be invisible in the USA is to not have your name in the system.
Yea and that is called totalitarian.
And anit freedom.
The definition of Anarchist is:
" a person who rebels against any authority, established order, or ruling power"
It says nothing about violence.
What's worse is some don't think at all.Oh so according to you, the US government was totalitarian because it prohibited ANARCHISTS from immigrating into the US.
No offense but some people think so dangerous they need to be removed from society.
So, by definition, a person who asserts they have rights is not an anarchist, at least here in the US where the having of rights is part and parcel of the established order and authority.
These are the .00001%, the dumb****s we'd rather not have as countrymen. So, yeah, when they're harrassed, as long as it's through warrant and proper process, it's rather enjoyable to see.
Well we can't have the police or anyone in uniform or 'connected' take action. However, I would give money to an underground or shadow 'organisation' who, say, deployed a metric ****-ton of OC gas on any given occupy crowd.
Maybe we could some folks in the IRS to decide to audit members of occupy.
**** happens every day. Cars get keyed and facebooks get hacked all the time. If there were a trend of random acts of violence against members of occupyX, it would be a pure coincidence; just like all those city dump trucks blocking Westburo Baptists from protesting a funeral was a mere oversite. As I said, **** happens all the time.
Lean:RightAnarchists in Wacco TX being killed:
Lean:Socialist like you cheered and smiled and threw parties.
So tell me, why do Lean:socialists cheer when Lean:rightAnarchists get killed but you guys defend Lean:leftAnarchists?
Cool... That is not justification for a warrant..... Because a riot happened in town and these group is part of OLA that is not justification to bust down a door and search a permisis.Lets see, according to the article that you posted, there was a riot on May Day.
Thank you Patriot Act.Since a search was conducted, there must of been enough evidence of probable cause for the judge to issue the warrant.
This really isnt a "liberal, conservative" state issue.Washington is a heavily liberal state, especially in cities, so I have to assume that that judge probably needed far more evidence for the warrant than would a judge in Texas issuing a warrant for the same thing against the same group.
Lean:RightAnarchists in Wacco TX being killed:
Lean:Socialist like you cheered and smiled and threw parties.
So tell me, why do Lean:socialists cheer when Lean:rightAnarchists get killed but you guys defend Lean:leftAnarchists?
They're dumbasses, why should I care? They shouldn't be protesting this issue in the first place, so ****'em. We need a little Project Mayhem to come clean house. Same with Westburo Baptists.Would you have a problem if Occupy X-ers were being harassed and beaten, even if they were not committing a crime?
They're dumbasses, why should I care? They shouldn't be protesting this issue in the first place, so ****'em.
Because it's not a genuine grievance held by the People. It's organised by special interest groups, hell the protesters were even being paid at points. It's not legit, it's an abuse of the right, and as such it needs to be put down. Now the cops can't do anything since these morons are within the letter of the law, so we need an extra-legal body to take action.Why shouldn't they be protesting?
Because it's not a genuine grievance held by the People. It's organised by special interest groups, hell the protesters were even being paid at points. It's not legit, it's an abuse of the right, and as such it needs to be put down. Now the cops can't do anything since these morons are within the letter of the law, so we need an extra-legal body to take action.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?