By that logic then you could argue that people should either always be healthy or we have no responsibility to help save them when their condition gets worse and should view them as if they were somehow actively to blame for or seeking their own deaths by either being born with a condition, developing one for a variety of reasons or just not beating odds stacked against them because you openly claim this less lethal virus only killed them because they either were at fault or were too weak and at risk.
- Have a congenital heart problem? Too bad you get to die when you catch a cold that triggers your heart attack because it wasn't that lethal and any healthy person would have survived so it was obvious that your sudden turn was just your heart and not what may or may not have changed circumstances to cause it to fail suddenly when signs point to you living with treatment.
- Smoke cigarettes every day and develop emphysema? Too bad you get to die when again a common cold leads to pneumonia which would have been fine if you had just not messed up your body. Why didn't you with every waking breath know from the start of your life to treat your body as a temple and never ever do anything since you should be born with perfect knowledge and understanding of the consequences of every action like every human ever born.
- Born genetically perfect. Too bad you accidentally bumped your chest into your lovers shoulder and stopped your heart with just the right impact which can happen to anyone and is so insanely rare we might as well let you die because you have to be a fluke. You know we probably shouldn't write it down its so rare and maybe we should just list the cause as unknown considering that no one would believe it and we don't want them to panic at the thought of the danger of this not that lethal circumstance.
- Or again you are born perfectly healthy. Too bad you caught chicken pox and had a bad case which killed you. I mean look at you dying from a disease people often infect their kids with to trigger herd immunity and you had to go and futz it all up by just not beating the incredibly small odds of death.
You are also arguing that people who don't want to die and are less healthy than you but stable are just acceptable casualties so you can feel safer by artificially lowering the numbers of deaths caused by a pandemic that can more easily trigger their deaths.
- I mean say five healthy people of varying ages die and three at risk people die because the odds were against them all and somehow the three sick people who got sicker and died are more at fault because they could not predict a pandemic nor avoid catching a highly contagious virus that doesn't kill healthy people as often?
Lets just be honest here. Healthy people die of Covid. Seemingly healthy people die of Covid. Young people die of Covid. Old people die of Covid. Sick people die of Covid. The only differences between them and the people that live are circumstances and estimated odds that don't always work out for every individual in any group that catches it.
These people are mothers, brothers, sisters, fathers, grandparents, babies, humans all. None of them went out and got Covid on purpose and those struggling before with a condition are no less dead for catching Covid and dying from complications.
As for those who recover and then die this disease has been reported to have lasting permanent effects on sufferers health such as weakened hearts, damage to the brain, lung issues and even after recovery and immunity is not guaranteed after infection in all cases. A person dying after may only die due to the stress of barely fighting off Covid before their body gives in. Covid still killed them it just died before they did.
