• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every persons position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Search results

  1. Cephus

    Your thoughts on Agnostics

    And he doesn't care. At this point, he's just a troll, telling people what labels they are allowed to use. It's a pointless waste of time.
  2. Cephus

    Your thoughts on Agnostics

    Sure. But that's not knowledge and all the strong belief in the world doesn't make it true. Words mean things for a reason.
  3. Cephus

    Your thoughts on Agnostics

    No, they believe it. They cannot know it because nothing they believe is demonstrable or objectively testable. All the belief in the world doesn't make a thing reality. It is real or not real based on the facts, not on the fantasies.
  4. Cephus

    The Sh&tball Atheist "Movement"

    My first response was "what has this guy been smoking?"
  5. Cephus

    Do members of Congress and heads of government departments make too much?

    Immediate family should be forbidden from getting any government contracts, period. It's too easy to receive favored treatment.
  6. Cephus

    Do members of Congress and heads of government departments make too much?

    There's nothing wrong with that once they are out of office. If they are still on the public dole though, it shouldn't be permitted.
  7. Cephus

    Your thoughts on Agnostics

    There is a big difference between "I found utility in this story" and "this story is true".
  8. Cephus

    Your thoughts on Agnostics

    Except you don't have any knowledge of the Biblical God, only the stories told in the Bible. They are not the same.
  9. Cephus

    Your thoughts on Agnostics

    Other than all of the difference, you mean.
  10. Cephus

    Your thoughts on Agnostics

    I know, it's funny to watch. You have to be really clueless or really bored to keep going on this for so long.
  11. Cephus

    Your thoughts on Agnostics

    Such is your claim, but all you keep talking about are myths, not Taranis.
  12. Cephus

    Your thoughts on Agnostics

    I'm not denying he has knowledge about the myth, I'm denying he has knowledge about Taranis. There is a difference.
  13. Cephus

    Your thoughts on Agnostics

    Fine, then you don't know about Taranis. You know about the myths told about Taranis. Glad we could clear that up for you.
  14. Cephus

    Your thoughts on Agnostics

    But you're changing the idea from knowledge about a subject, to knowledge about the object of that subject. You can read all the books on Taranis you want. You can read all the claims people have made about Taranis you'd like. None of that actually refers to a real Taranis. You know about...
  15. Cephus

    Your thoughts on Agnostics

    You have knowledge of claims made about Taranis. You do not have knowledge of any real Taranis.
  16. Cephus

    Your thoughts on Agnostics

    Yes, knowledge. Not claims. Not ideas. Knowledge. I even produced the definition of it. You can have knowledge of what it says in a Harry Potter book. The books are real. You cannot have knowledge of a real Hogwarts. Hogwarts is not real.
  17. Cephus

    Your thoughts on Agnostics

    That's the only subject I've ever talked about.
  18. Cephus

    Did you ever really believe?

    Absolutely I did, once upon a time. Then I realized how idiotic and indefensible it all is.
  19. Cephus

    Your thoughts on Agnostics

    The claims you read exist, ink on a page. That doesn't mean they have any validity in the real world.
  20. Cephus

    Your thoughts on Agnostics

    You're missing the point, on purpose it seems. Reading claims that Taranis is real, or gods, or unicorns, or anything else, is not the same as obtaining knowledge that they are real. Knowledge and claims are not the same. Knowledge is independently verifiable. It goes beyond "I read this in...
Top Bottom