• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Search results

  1. F

    Is healthcare a right?

    Of course you haven't received a bill. The costs are hidden from you.
  2. F

    Is healthcare a right?

    No and no.
  3. F

    Company’s ban against gay weddings is akin to ‘white applicants only’ sign, judge say

    Re: Company’s ban against gay weddings is akin to ‘white applicants only’ sign, judge Some of them do, yes. Ever see news stories about designers who don't want to dress Melania? They are pretty vocal about it.
  4. F

    Company’s ban against gay weddings is akin to ‘white applicants only’ sign, judge say

    Re: Company’s ban against gay weddings is akin to ‘white applicants only’ sign, judge Besides court order=force? Or do you dispute that? Or do you onomatopoeia the calculus of bojanglification.
  5. F

    Company’s ban against gay weddings is akin to ‘white applicants only’ sign, judge say

    Re: Company’s ban against gay weddings is akin to ‘white applicants only’ sign, judge If someone cheated on their wife and decided to marry the other woman, I wouldn't celebrate their new marriage with them. Your list may sound similar on the surface, but it's not really applicable. If a satan...
  6. F

    Company’s ban against gay weddings is akin to ‘white applicants only’ sign, judge say

    Re: Company’s ban against gay weddings is akin to ‘white applicants only’ sign, judge I'm not sure what part of a court order would not be considered force. Let me know when you'd like to agree on basic English definitions so that a rational dialogue could be had.
  7. F

    Trump Ramps Up Obamacare Sabotage With Huge Cuts To Enrollment Programs

    Also, there is nowhere in the world that having "acne and things like that" can keep you from buying healthcare. It is certainly not the case in the U.S. I'd be interested to see you defend the statement though.
  8. F

    Trump Ramps Up Obamacare Sabotage With Huge Cuts To Enrollment Programs

    You obviously don't understand what "insurance" means if you think people with pre-existing conditions should be able to purchase it. Obamacare has made it illegal to sell health insurance plans. What's legal to sell right now is some twisted, expensive pre-payment plan that's not worth what it...
  9. F

    Company’s ban against gay weddings is akin to ‘white applicants only’ sign, judge say

    Re: Company’s ban against gay weddings is akin to ‘white applicants only’ sign, judge Also disingenuous. Being in a protected class does not prevent you from being discriminated against.
  10. F

    Company’s ban against gay weddings is akin to ‘white applicants only’ sign, judge say

    Re: Company’s ban against gay weddings is akin to ‘white applicants only’ sign, judge If I pointed a gun at someone and said "walk away or I shoot", I haven't technically forced them to do anything, but it would be disingenuous to suggest that. You're right. It's not rocket science.
  11. F

    Company’s ban against gay weddings is akin to ‘white applicants only’ sign, judge say

    Re: Company’s ban against gay weddings is akin to ‘white applicants only’ sign, judge There is a list. Some people are on it. Others are not. It is arbitrary and subject to change at any time.
  12. F

    Company’s ban against gay weddings is akin to ‘white applicants only’ sign, judge say

    Re: Company’s ban against gay weddings is akin to ‘white applicants only’ sign, judge He doesn't typically make cakes celebrating gay marriage, because he doesn't believe such a thing exists. If a gay man married a gay woman, I expect he'd celebrate right along with them.
  13. F

    Company’s ban against gay weddings is akin to ‘white applicants only’ sign, judge say

    Re: Company’s ban against gay weddings is akin to ‘white applicants only’ sign, judge https://aclu-co.org/court-rules-bakery-illegally-discriminated-against-gay-couple/ They are, actually.
  14. F

    Company’s ban against gay weddings is akin to ‘white applicants only’ sign, judge say

    Re: Company’s ban against gay weddings is akin to ‘white applicants only’ sign, judge Sort of like the authoritarian "liberal" democrat... Then again, I "hate gays". Do I have to bake you a cake?
  15. F

    Company’s ban against gay weddings is akin to ‘white applicants only’ sign, judge say

    Re: Company’s ban against gay weddings is akin to ‘white applicants only’ sign, judge Well, at that point it would be settled law, so I guess they'd just have to deal with it. There's no need to tolerate people with silly ideas anyway.
  16. F

    Company’s ban against gay weddings is akin to ‘white applicants only’ sign, judge say

    Re: Company’s ban against gay weddings is akin to ‘white applicants only’ sign, judge The behavior of not doing something?
  17. F

    Company’s ban against gay weddings is akin to ‘white applicants only’ sign, judge say

    Re: Company’s ban against gay weddings is akin to ‘white applicants only’ sign, judge These things seem worthy goals to me as well. Like many other things in society, making laws to enforce these things is a bad idea. The law itself IS arbitrary. There is an arbitrary list of groups with...
  18. F

    Company’s ban against gay weddings is akin to ‘white applicants only’ sign, judge say

    Re: Company’s ban against gay weddings is akin to ‘white applicants only’ sign, judge If some went into a Christian baker's shop and asked them to make a cake with two dicks intertwined on top, would you accuse them of bigotry if they said no? How about a cake with an aborted baby on top? A...
  19. F

    Company’s ban against gay weddings is akin to ‘white applicants only’ sign, judge say

    Re: Company’s ban against gay weddings is akin to ‘white applicants only’ sign, judge So explain yourself, because you don't make sense.
  20. F

    Company’s ban against gay weddings is akin to ‘white applicants only’ sign, judge say

    Re: Company’s ban against gay weddings is akin to ‘white applicants only’ sign, judge Unfair = Unconstitutional?
Top Bottom