• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Search results

  1. Mark F

    Did the British make a mistake building the Queen Elizabeth class aircraft carriers?

    Re: Did the British make a mistake building the Queen Elizabeth class aircraft carrie More like 8 years, not 3.
  2. Mark F

    Did the British make a mistake building the Queen Elizabeth class aircraft carriers?

    Re: Did the British make a mistake building the Queen Elizabeth class aircraft carrie And an even smaller army, navy and less amphibious lift than in 1982. And oh yeah, less money.
  3. Mark F

    Did the British make a mistake building the Queen Elizabeth class aircraft carriers?

    Re: Did the British make a mistake building the Queen Elizabeth class aircraft carrie Argentina is probably less capable of retaking the Falkland's now than Britain is of getting them back again.
  4. Mark F

    Did the British make a mistake building the Queen Elizabeth class aircraft carriers?

    Re: Did the British make a mistake building the Queen Elizabeth class aircraft carrie So when you created this thread then, asking IF the QE's were a mistake it was a rhetorical question? Are you just looking for affirmation, not actual answers? :confused: You gave some reasons why you think...
  5. Mark F

    Did the British make a mistake building the Queen Elizabeth class aircraft carriers?

    Re: Did the British make a mistake building the Queen Elizabeth class aircraft carrie Just MHO valued at precisely :twocents: Any conflict the British are likely to be involved in will not be at home. That means power projection and that means carriers. All of this is detailed in the 1998...
  6. Mark F

    After 15 years of delusional stupidity flights 11 and 175 were still absent [W: 307]

    Re: After 15 years of delusional stupidity flights 11 and 175 were still absent from And he doesn't quite get geometry or direction either. Trust me, nothing could be a bigger waste of time than indulging this fantasy. You can not reason someone out of a position they did not reason...
  7. Mark F

    Is Chelsea's Apartment a Licensed Medical Facility?

    I've had pneumonia twice. Went home both times - to a house with children present. Big whoopdee doo.
  8. Mark F

    9/11 Truth Group after 9 years finally appears to do something useful. [W: #120]

    Re: 9/11 Truth Group after 9 years finally appears to do something useful. It is hard to reason with a person who pretends to not understand that the process is that thing that happens between the start and the finish and that if someone promises and open and transparent process that therefore...
  9. Mark F

    9/11 Truth Group after 9 years finally appears to do something useful. [W: #120]

    Re: 9/11 Truth Group after 9 years finally appears to do something useful. That is why you fail. All of those "updates" were posted around the time of the original press release were already months old material. Since announcing the project exists they have released nothing new. This is...
  10. Mark F

    After 15 years of delusional stupidity flights 11 and 175 were still absent [W: 307]

    Re: After 15 years of delusional stupidity flights 11 and 175 were still absent from 7's convinced. He's been plying this stuff unashamedly and with zero reservations for years. As 9/11 CT's go it is by far the most hilarious thing going but it does get old after a while and I'm done poking...
  11. Mark F

    After 15 years of delusional stupidity flights 11 and 175 were still absent [W: 307]

    Re: After 15 years of delusional stupidity flights 11 and 175 were still absent from Quick - name a twin-engine commercial jet that is 25% wider than a B767,.... Oh wait the photo's were just taken at different angles and distances and some anonymous dumbass on the internet couldn't figure out...
  12. Mark F

    9/11 Truth Group after 9 years finally appears to do something useful. [W: #120]

    Re: 9/11 Truth Group after 9 years finally appears to do something useful. You can rationalize all you want but when someone says "UAF and AE911Truth will make this study completely open and transparent" and "Unlike NIST,... By making the study open and transparent throughout the entire...
  13. Mark F

    After 15 years of delusional stupidity flights 11 and 175 were still absent [W: 307]

    Re: After 15 years of delusional stupidity flights 11 and 175 were still absent from Why is it you insist on using only the absolute lowest quality imagery available and reject everything else - all other imagery, all physical evidence, radar, witnesses, etc, etc, etc,...? Do you understand...
  14. Mark F

    After 15 years of delusional stupidity flights 11 and 175 were still absent [W: 307]

    Re: After 15 years of delusional stupidity flights 11 and 175 were still absent from April who? Why can you produce no clear footage of a ball? Every camera in New York was pointed at the Twin Towers that morning so there should be hundreds, maybe thousands of frames of your mythical ball...
  15. Mark F

    After 15 years of delusional stupidity flights 11 and 175 were still absent [W: 307]

    Re: After 15 years of delusional stupidity flights 11 and 175 were still absent from The ball does look like a plane. Exactly like a plane. I mean, its heavily pixilated because the camera is miles away, of too low a resolution (the pixels are bigger than the planes features) and focusing on...
  16. Mark F

    After 15 years of delusional stupidity flights 11 and 175 were still absent [W: 307]

    Re: After 15 years of delusional stupidity flights 11 and 175 were still absent from Move goalposts much? You can't explain who threw the ball.
  17. Mark F

    After 15 years of delusional stupidity flights 11 and 175 were still absent [W: 307]

    Re: After 15 years of delusional stupidity flights 11 and 175 were still absent from Obviously, the only authentic view of the attack was taken from the furthest distance away by a low-quality, out-of-focus camera on a rooftop on the wrong side of the towers from the impact. Everything else...
  18. Mark F

    After 15 years of delusional stupidity flights 11 and 175 were still absent [W: 307]

    Re: After 15 years of delusional stupidity flights 11 and 175 were still absent from :no: Your claim, your burden of proof. Who threw the ball? How could the ball have been between the towers before 2 exploded?
  19. Mark F

    After 15 years of delusional stupidity flights 11 and 175 were still absent [W: 307]

    Re: After 15 years of delusional stupidity flights 11 and 175 were still absent from Don't change the subject, this is about your claim, your OP. You claimed there was a ball. Someone had to throw it. Who threw the ball?
  20. Mark F

    After 15 years of delusional stupidity flights 11 and 175 were still absent [W: 307]

    Re: After 15 years of delusional stupidity flights 11 and 175 were still absent from Who threw it?
Top Bottom