• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Recent content by Archer

  1. Archer

    From the Economist: Voting Wrongs

    So basically you're gloating about how white and European Europe is? That's so racist! We here in the States have our own problems and peculiar history. Socialism can't work here, with the "black activists" and Hispanidad La Raza nationalists and the white hippie liberals comprising the...
  2. Archer

    Referendum finale: Immigration vs Economy

    What about the old-fashioned socialist appeal that the EU is a capitalist superstate with delusions of its own geopolitical will, conquest and so on? It's the most uniform conglomeration of the modern, late-capitalism bourgeoisie on the globe. The EU remains intact to the detriment of the...
  3. Archer

    Referendum finale: Immigration vs Economy

    There is absolutely no comparison between, for example, the Anglo-Saxons who invaded and settled England and built up the country, creating its legal infrastructure and so on, to recent immigrants to the UK with whom the government has been collaborating. Furthermore, the "invaders" who've come...
  4. Archer

    Is Bill Nye saying that race-based programs...

    Race biologically exists and the assertion that it does not is so absurd it could only be believed by politically-motivated (Western) scientists. The human races have evolved to adapt to their respective climates and each race's genetic makeup varies (as do their skulls, even skeletons)...
  5. Archer

    Why isn't Iraq a stable Democracy?

    Basically, the French and British were thinking about their own imperial interests at the time. Any sensible plan would have redrawn boundaries along religious and ethnic lines. But if that had happened, the British would have lost control of the Mediterranean, an Arab superstate might have...
  6. Archer

    Why you should vote for Gary Johnson

    Third party contenders siphon votes from the candidate to whom they're more ideologically similar, or the candidate whose supporters overlap with their own. With Johnson, the effect of any meaningful insurgency is clear: HRC walks the election.
  7. Archer

    Why isn't Iraq a stable Democracy?

    You have to admire the Japanese. They saw their Emperor, God himself, humiliated in defeat by the gum-chewing Americans, and yet they swallowed their pride and adopted our system of market capitalism and liberal democracy. (Okay, admittedly the boots of a few of our troops were involved).
  8. Archer

    Do natural rights exist?[W:811:1629]

    Re: Do natural rights exist? There seems to be recurrent misunderstanding in this thread about what natural rights are. They're inalienable, which means they cannot be taken away from their possessor. Of course, without the backing of the law they might not be protected, or even more pernicious...
  9. Archer

    Why isn't Iraq a stable Democracy?

    The Sykes-Picot Agreement, which carved Iraq as we know it today, trapping ethnic and sectarian hostilities within those dreaded, straight lines, should shoulder some (not all) of the blame. The Iraqis are highly tribal and they've had the boot of foreigners on their neck for hundreds of years...
See more
Back
Top Bottom