- Joined
- Mar 31, 2018
- Messages
- 60,685
- Reaction score
- 6,465
- Location
- Norcross, Georgia
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
Restricting the rights of people to bear arms has done nothing to stop people from getting their hands on guns.
Well you have to go outside of the USA for evidence
The best example would be the UK, where guns are banned and gun crime - though not totally unknown - is very rare
The sad reality is criminals have no trouble finding guns illegally....
How much trouble do criminals in the UK have to go to - bearing in mind that your average armed robber is basically on a subsistence level of survival and hardly super rich
...making more laws is not the solution. Educating the people who are losing their right to bear arms so they don't lose their right is the answer. If they cannot be rehabilitated then they do not belong back on the streets. That is the problem with our judicial system. Releasing dangerous people back into society is the wrong answer. This what needs to be addressed. Restricting the rights of law abiding people is clearly not the solution.
So the only solution is to pass laws that ban guns*
Sorry but "educating people who are losing their right, so they don't lose their right" ?
This makes no sense
So you would allow released felons to have guns - if they receive this "education" ?
If a felon, convicted of a violent crime (say assault) has served the sentence handed out by the judge, what mechanism would you use to keep them in jail ?
How can you have an unrestricted supply of guns to the "law abiding" and not create a de-facto unrestricted supply to prohibited people ?
*Subject to exemptions discussed previously